Quick Question:
Oct. 21st, 2008 03:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
home_and_awayIs there any resounding reason (beyond "The man would refuse a nomination, having better things to do with his life than untangle the US's Gordian knot.") why Aaron Sorkin in 2012 wouldn't work?
The guy seems to have a knack for seeing both sides of a thing and eloquently defending the one he picks. He also has a unique perspective on the workings of the media and would, hypothetically, be quite capable of controlling his public image.
How about it?
The guy seems to have a knack for seeing both sides of a thing and eloquently defending the one he picks. He also has a unique perspective on the workings of the media and would, hypothetically, be quite capable of controlling his public image.
How about it?
